The result is that the LS11000 looks far better, subjectively, than the numbers suggest. However, this mode is more useful on the LS11000, since this adjustment happens pretty much instantly, far faster than the mechanical iris on the 5050. Even the LS11000's dynamic contrast is lower, where the laser power tracks the brightness of incoming video signal and adjusts accordingly. I was so surprised by that result I kept remeasuring it. As measured by me, the 5050 has a far better native contrast ratio at 5,200:1 vs. So between those two projectors the LS11000 is definitely sharper, which makes sense because it has twice the resolution.Ĭomparing the two Epsons, however, is rather interesting. Epson's new pixel shifter shifts pixels 4x instead of 2x. That's one of the biggest changes from the 5050 to the LS11000. Instead, each pixel on the imager works double or quadruple duty, responsible for 2 or 4 pixels on screen. Ostensibly, all three of these projectors are 4K, but none have 3,840x2,160 pixel imaging chips (to get that you'll need to spend even more money). Sharpness is not the most important aspect of a projector's performance in my book, but differences in detail between the three were noticeable right away. I connected all three via a Monoprice 1x4 distribution amplifier, and viewed them on a 102-inch 1.0-gain screen. Perhaps one is more of a winner than the others? We shall see. I liked both of these projectors, so really, they're all winners. The 5050 is a traditional lamp-lit projector, but it's close in price and performance. Both are less expensive than the LS11000 but they have a lot in common. But then, for $4,000 the nits deserve to be picked.įor my side-by-side comparison I pitted the Epson LS11000 against Epson's own 5050 and the Optoma UHZ50. Among projectors we've reviewed, it's second only to the more expensive Sony VPL-VW325ES. The LS11000 is still a great projector, and all the new pieces and subtle changes - plus the benefits of using lasers - add up to an overall excellent image. Both delivered superb picture quality in my tests, with excellent color and bright, punchy images, but the performance of the next-gen LS11000 isn't the massive improvement implied by that new technology.ĭon't get me wrong. The LS11000 costs $1,000 more and promises a significant leap forward, with more pixels on screen and the aforementioned lasers. A lamp happens to power Epson's own Home Cinema 5050 too, a projector we loved and which stays in the company's lineup. The Epson Home Cinema LS11000 is a higher-end 4K projector powered by lasers rather than the traditional lamps used by most of its competitors. Performance doesn't quite justify the price Maybe swapping out the crunchy options for a couple more acoustic models would have made it even more useful, but this remains an appealing six-string multi-tool and a genuine problem-solver for many gigging players.Not as detailed as some 4K DLP projectors “The launch of the Acoustasonic Player Telecaster feels like a no-brainer move for Fender, spreading the potential appeal of what is virtually a whole new category of guitar. The feel of the bevelled arm rest and fingerboard edges says quality and comfort this is an inviting guitar and that Modern Deep-C neck will feel familiar to anyone who has played the electric Player series models.” A lovely dark rosewood fingerboard and bridge replaces the US version’s ebony, but that’s not anissue for us. “In terms of feel and build, we honestly can’t find a compromise between this Ensenada-made Player and the US Acoustasonics we’ve tried. MusicRadar: The onboard voice options might have been scaled down but the Acoustasonic Telecaster sticks the landing as a Player Series model, in what could be one of the guitars to make the hybrid build truly go mainstream.įender Player Series Acoustasonic Telecaster: The web says That, in sum, is the sort of thing the Acoustasonic format encourages. That said, it can be pressed into service of many different kinds of styles, perhaps some that are all your own. It is warmer, with a little more width than you’d expect from a Tele’s bridge pickup. Fender promises twang but this isn’t Pete Anderson levels of twang. Park yourself on position one for a more traditional electric guitar experience, but don’t necessarily expect a traditional Telecaster experience. In a sense, this is a sound that almost exists outside of the spectrum of acoustic/electric tones, and is sure to support pedalboard experimentation. The sound is just coming from the piezo and as you turn the blend control it adds drive. Here is where the true hybrid tones are, and as such, there are fewer references for what we are hearing.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |